The film Bend It Like Beckham (2002) directed by Gurinder Chadha follows the traditional three-acts structure. The order of the events is chronological. The plot is centered on the main character’s struggle to pursue her passion, against the wishes of her family. At the end of the film, the family finally accepts her decision.
The main character is Jess Bhamra, an Indian girl who lives in England. She is a good football player and dreams of playing professionally. Her family disapproves of her hobby, so Jess lies to them so she can keep playing. Other important characters in the film are Jess’ friend and teammate, Jules Paxton, and her love interest and coach, Joe.
The setting of the film is the town of Hounslow, England. The story takes place in modern times, at the beginning of the 21st century when concepts such as women playing football were still frowned upon in some circles.
The film uses symbols and motifs to better illustrate the themes and message of the story. The symbols and motifs highlight Jess’ struggle throughout the film to pursue her dream.
You can read a full analysis of the film in the following pages.
Excerpt from the study guide:
Misunderstandings frequently appear in the film. Despite the fact that they have bad consequences, they are also intended to be a source of comedy.
Tejinder’s parents see Jess and Jules as they drive by and reach the conclusion that they are kissing, when they are in fact laughing together while leaning on each other. This misunderstanding leads to Pinky’s wedding being cancelled. Jess tells her parents what actually happened.
Another misunderstanding is Mrs. Paxton listening in on the conversation between Jess and Jules and jumping to the conclusion that they are in a romantic relationship. This leads to Mrs. Paxton confronting Jess and insulting her in front of her family. This misunderstanding is cleared up by Jules who pulls Mrs. Paxton aside and explains the situation to her.
In both cases, the misunderstandings happen because the people who jump to the wrong conclusions have been expecting something like this to happen. In the case of Tejinder’s parents, they thought they were better than the Bhamras and were just looking for an excuse to cancel the engagement, at least according to Mrs. Bhamra.
Mrs. Paxton was always anxious about her daughter not being interested in boys or in wearing feminine clothes. In both these cases, the misunderstandings reveal more about the stereotypes and prejudices of the people who create them than about reality.
