I denne vejledning får gode råd til at løse Opgave 1-4 i STX A-eksamenssættet fra 19. maj 2017 med netadgang.
I de første tre opgaver hjælper vi dig med at anvende og forklare grammatikken korrekt, mens vi i opgave 4 giver dig gode råd til at beskrive tekstens sproglige stil. Til sidst giver vi dig Studienets bud på en komplet besvarelse af opgaverne, så du kan tjekke dine svar.
Opgaverne, som du får hjælp til, er:
Opgave 1
I hver af nedenstående sætninger er en grammatisk fejl understreget. Skriv den korrekte sætning, og forklar dine rettelser med udgangspunkt i sætningerne. Brug relevant grammatisk/faglig terminologi. Skriv din forklaring på dansk.
- In non-western countries the process of spreading the democracy is not always smooth.
- Western politicians often expect democracy to be the preferred form of government in all societys.
- General elections, which are nowadays hold in many countries, are often manipulated by dictators.
- Is it possible to live in Britain or the USA without knowing nothing about democracy?
- If we do not understand how democracy works, we exclude ourself from society.
- Rory Stewart seems to think that the voters do not always treat their politicians friendly.
- On Instagram you can follow your friends’ activities and comment on theirs photos.
- One of the characters in the short story “Lightbox” uploads a photo of a berry smoothie, which makes you think it must taste wonderfully.
- Before social media became an integral part of society, considered people them just a whim.
- A selection of short stories by Emma Cleary, who has a PhD in literature, have been published in literary magazines.
Opgave 2
I nedenstående uddrag fra “Why democracy matters” er i alt 8 adjektiver (tillægsord) og adverbier (biord) understreget.
- Angiv for hvert eksempel, hvilken ordklasse det understregede ord er.
- Forklar for hvert af eksemplerne, hvorfor der er brugt enten adjektiv eller adverbium. Brug relevant grammatisk/faglig terminologi. Skriv dit svar på dansk.
We’ve gone through three elections, presidential and parliamentary. And what do we find? Do we find a flourishing (1) civil society, a vigorous rule of law and good security? No. What we find in Afghanistan is a judiciary that is weak and corrupt, a very (2) limited civil society which is largely (3) ineffective, a media which is beginning to get onto its feet but a government that’s deeply (4) unpopular (5), perceived as being deeply corrupt, and security that is shocking, security that’s terrible. […]
Well, what is the answer to this? Is the answer to just give up on the idea of democracy? Well, obviously not. It would be absurd if we were to engage again (6) in the kind of operations we were engaged in in Iraq and Afghanistan – if we were to suddenly (7) find ourselves in a situation in which we were imposing anything other than a democratic system.
Opgave 3
I nedenstående uddrag fra novellen “Lightbox” er 6 pronominer (stedord) understreget.
- Angiv, hvilken type pronomen der er tale om i hver understregning.
- Forklar for hvert eksempel, hvilken funktion pronomenet har i sætningen. Brug relevant grammatisk/faglig terminologi. Skriv din forklaring på dansk.
I go back inside and poke around inside the fridge. There is some leftover Chinese food and I have this (1) for dinner, while Elsie’s out. I do some (2) work at my laptop until the light from the screen is the only light coming from inside the room. I wonder where she (3) is and check my (4) phone. It’s unlike her (5) not to let me (6) know where she is or where she’s going.
Opgave 4
Nedenstående uddrag fra Rory Stewarts TED talk “Why democracy matters” er kendetegnet ved forskellige stillejer. Beskriv disse forskelle, især med fokus på syntaks (sætningskonstruktion), konjunktioner (bindeord) og adjektiver (tillægsord). Brug relevant grammatisk/faglig terminologi og eksempler fra teksten. Skriv dit svar på dansk.
So little Billy goes to school, and he sits down and the teacher says, “What does your father do?” And little Billy says, “My father plays the piano in an opium den.” So the teacher rings up the parents, and says, “Very shocking story from little Billy today. Just heard that he claimed that you play the piano in an opium den.” And the father says, “I’m very sorry. Yes, it’s true, I lied. But how can I tell an eight-year-old boy that
his father is a politician?”
Now, as a politician myself, standing in front of you, or indeed, meeting any stranger anywhere in the world, when I eventually reveal the nature of my profession, they look at me as though I’m somewhere between a snake, a monkey and an iguana, and through all of this, I feel, strongly, that something is going wrong. Four hundred years of maturing democracy, colleagues in Parliament who seem to me, as individuals, reasonably impressive, an increasingly educated, energetic, informed population, and yet a deep, deep sense of disappointment
